送交者: wintersing 于 April 03, 2002 16:08:23:

回答: 一个搞社会科学的人写的，没有任何新东西，能说明什么问题？ 由 方舟子 于 April 03, 2002 15:53:56:

What is your counter argurment to disapprove her points other than attack her credential.
Can you be more specific about why she is wrong.
I will go with you, you can prove your point

• My taking on this issue - Latino2 (907 bytes) 17:19:20 4/03/02 (3)
  • Thank you very much - wintersing (2058 bytes) 00:23:15 4/04/02 (2)
    • as long as one is not clinically low IQ - Latino2 (379 bytes) 11:03:28 4/04/02 (0)
    • 问了个弱智问题还自作聪明当“argue” - 方舟子 (92 bytes) 02:51:23 4/04/02 (0)
• 我只是综合学术界较普遍的意见，又不是我的创见 - 方舟子 (54 bytes) 16:32:44 4/03/02 (7)
  • So does she! And her article is on Scientific American - wintersing (7772 bytes) 17:07:59 4/03/02 (6)
    • 从你这种比较就说明你的智商不高 - 方舟子 (112 bytes) 18:08:40 4/03/02 (5)
      • 文章千古事﹐得失寸心知 - wintersing (138 bytes) 00:11:32 4/04/02 (4)
        • 说你智商不高却偏要自作聪明。我文章里面不提到现在还有个“智商学派”？ - 方舟子 (116 bytes) 02:45:10 4/04/02 (3)
          • Don't see you disprove the existance of general intelligence - wintersing (1105 bytes) 10:40:05 4/04/02 (2)
            • 真是个弱智，知道什么叫谁声称谁举证吗？ - 方舟子 (114 bytes) 14:34:37 4/04/02 (1)
              • agree! - 知非 (0 bytes) 14:48:59 4/04/02 (0)

加跟贴