我认为您回信中如果给出common accepted definitions那才真是insult


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 羽矢 于 2011-08-08, 14:41:02:

回答: 他应该是从“方学家”那里学来的中国法律 由 方舟子 于 2011-08-08, 14:26:01:

Shi-min Fang:
I don't think it consists of plagiarism or copyright infringement according to the common accepted definitions with which you disagree.

Bob Root-Bernstein:
Now you add the additional insult in arguing that I am mis-using the concepts of plagiarism and copyright infringement in making my accusations.

wiki:

引用:
Plagiarism is defined in dictionaries as the "wrongful appropriation," "close imitation," or "purloining and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions," and the representation of them as one's own original work

"Plagiarism" is not mentioned in any current statute, either criminal or civil

Plagiarism is not the same as copyright infringement.

Essential English Dictionary

引用:
plagiarism
noun
1. a piece of writing that has been copied from someone else and is presented as being your own work

More:
http://www.google.com/search?q=definition+plagiarism




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明