The key here is to control spending

送交者: eddie 于 2011-11-17, 13:22:26:

回答: I disagree, especially about revenue neutral. 由 steven 于 2011-11-17, 13:08:33:

if you increase revenue and then spend it, you just keep the government growing and there will be no end of it. Revenue neutral is just a way saying that we are not paying any more for spending.

That's why I said I am okay with additional revenue if it's dedicated to pay down the debt.

所有跟贴:

The key is fair share. You take advantage of the system to become rich - silxirt (154 bytes) 2011-11-17, 14:52:21 (629109)
- You can take the advantage too (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 17:00:11 (629136)
- How about Asian kid need 2300SAT, - 不懂相对论 (69 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:16:44 (629116)
  - This is Racial Descrimination!, not fair at all - silxirt (56 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:32:18 (629120)
    - Then, there is no reason some one should pay more tax than others - 不懂相对论 (28 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:39:05 (629122)
      - 递加税不是均分，因此不“合理”，但一分钟挣别人一年的钱 - silxirt (113 bytes) 2011-11-17, 16:06:41 (629126)
        
        一分钟挣别人一年的钱为什么不合理 - 不懂相对论 (329 bytes) 2011-11-17, 16:24:46 (629128)
        
        系统造成的“不合理”。人类（文明）社会不允许弱肉强食 - silxirt (100 bytes) 2011-11-17, 16:42:44 (629129)
        
        弱肉强食is the only reason of the existance of 人类（文明）社会 (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 17:01:51 (629139)
        
        How do you know 系统造成的“不合理"? Why 人类社会不允许弱肉强食? (无内容) - 不懂相对论 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 16:59:24 (629135)
you don't think Lex Luthor should pay more tax? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:25:51 (629087)
- How come you don't get this either? - eddie (261 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:28:33 (629088)
  - Haha, I agree with Steven but I'm not sure if Lex Luthor qualifies as "rich" - ASH (785 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:34:05 (629091)
    - he is ultra rich, Lexcop is one of those acme companies. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:39:28 (629094)
  - look at wikipedia. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:33:54 (629090)

加跟贴