美国的空军确实很强大，能A能B还能C。不过自从中华人民共和国成立后，

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: JFF 于 2010-08-11, 16:17:15:

美国空军就是不敢在中国领土上丢一个西红柿。
为什么呢？怕中国人不高兴呗。

所有跟贴:

自从中华人民共和国成立后，美国空军没有轰炸过中国领土？你确认了吗？ (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2010-08-12, 00:15:45 (473823)
虽然没丢西红柿，但战略侦察机却是常来常往的。看看这个。 - year2226 (73 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:51:44 (473690)
- my impression is that SR-71 had never been to USSR and China (无内容) - 006 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:14:58 (473736)
  - they have been deployed. SAM was not fast enough to catch them. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 20:06:39 (473752)
    - except SA-5 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2010-08-12, 02:18:22 (473854)
    - heard they were developed for that, however, never materialized - 006 (294 bytes) 2010-08-11, 20:49:38 (473758)
- that is a drone, not 战略侦察机 (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:32:26 (473707)
  - reconnaissance drone, 无人驾驶侦察机。 (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:37:32 (473709)
    - M-21 was infamous for its faliure rate. The program was canciled - steven (72 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:43:15 (473711)
      - But SR-71 was in operation untill 1998. - year2226 (153 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:56:17 (473714)
        
        We used SR-71 to simulate Satellite pass through in early 90s :) - steven (44 bytes) 2010-08-11, 18:04:28 (473718)
        
        I know that. I am interested in SR-71 because M-21/D-21 is a failed project. (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 18:41:12 (473723)
        
        SR-71 and M-21 were developed the same time by the same team. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 18:44:38 (473724)
        
        so why d-21 failed, but sr-71 sounds so successful ? (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:02:21 (473732)
        
        D-71 was too complicated for its time. - steven (45 bytes) 2010-08-11, 20:05:48 (473751)
- 中国是个大国，虽然还穷点，但就是有大国风范，不偷不抢不欺软怕硬。 - JFF (82 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:09:07 (473700)
- 偷鸡摸狗的小偷即使被抓住了，也就打一顿放了。 - JFF (94 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:57:29 (473694)
- 美国的SR-71似乎从未失手。 (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:55:28 (473692)
  - are you sure SR-71's ever been to China? (无内容) - 006 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 18:50:04 (473727)
    - I'm not sure. It's a story. I think it's highly possible now that D-21 did that. - year2226 (143 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:00:03 (473729)
      - has been -> had been (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:00:49 (473731)
  - 你是为美国是个没把抓住的小偷而骄傲？ (无内容) - JFF (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:01:16 (473697)
    - 要正视对手的优势。 (无内容) - year2226 (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:14:35 (473703)
      - 美国是当今世界上第一强国，美军是世界上第一强军队。还要怎么正视？ - JFF (596 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:40:50 (473744)
        
        我还要提醒你们不要忘记另一个重大史实：60年前共军主动出击美军， - JFF (30 bytes) 2010-08-11, 21:10:54 (473764)
但你也不要忘记了中国空军也从来不敢在越南在印度在台湾别说丢西红柿飞都不敢飞一下 (无内容) - HHS (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:27:21 (473682)
- 可是你忘了中国一贯的立场是不侵略别国不欺负小国弱国。 - JFF (221 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:37:48 (473686)
  - 当初到越南破坏个一塌糊涂不算欺负？敢对日本也同等对待吗？ (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:41:00 (473687)
    - 你是无知还是造谣？当初什么时候到越南破坏个一塌糊涂了？轰炸占领过越南一座城市吗？ - JFF (46 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:49:48 (473689)
      - 上次越战你在哪？撤退时拿不走的全破坏掉，电线杆锯掉一半... - silxirt (12 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:55:56 (473693)
        
        "三光"的^N th power!!! That's true!炸光，烧光,... (无内容) - Hoffman (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 21:59:07 (473769)
        
        不大可能，没有那么多人力锯电线杆 (无内容) - AQuestion (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 19:26:14 (473740)
        
        电线杆是军事设施你的明白？战场上的战利品怎么能留给敌人呢。 - JFF (26 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:00:07 (473696)
        
        日本的三光政策？哈哈，别离题，欺负了越南一把没错吧？ (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 17:02:29 (473698)
        
        “对越自卫反击战”，当初越军入侵柬埔寨，哪有精力侵略中国？ - silxirt (105 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:59:32 (473695)
美帝是纸老虎，最怕共产党。 (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2010-08-11, 16:20:41 (473678)

加跟贴