说起来也更有根据。X的问题都在他的论文里。我能在网上看到几篇摘要，X在于不懂基本的东西且不听同行评议一意孤行。最后这个石头越来越重，把自己砸得也更很。那个反方很起劲的野鹤（真好意思把自己读过的一堆垃圾书都列了出来，还洋洋自得，读这样的书肯定就这副德性）和那个自我感觉挺好的佚名（八股文章试帖诗，...眉样当年又入时。还颇能被一群同类追棒）也会是一样的悲剧。
首先X壶概念本身就是剽窃，他声称的“激活”导致神经再生站不住脚，因为神经只要不死亡，经常处于激活状态，只是人是否有明显感觉，许多感觉是意识不到的。
其次，X壶没有理论支持，理论对X壶是否定的。X的973研究结论是拚凑数据（文章数据与结论的关系根本不可能成立，不知是哪些人给出的鉴定就通过了）。诸多对X正面的支持有意掩盖了质疑、不同意见或批评意见。
还有，从事和X类似研究的也受到质疑和批评。如后面BBC的报导。
支持肖的从不反映这些批评和质疑。而且通过行政、司法的方式打压。
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2226263.stmControversy over spine surgery claim
Experimental spine surgery has enabled a paraplegic woman to walk again, a doctor has claimed.
However, spinal experts are concerned about the ethics of the procedure, which they view as untested and highly controversial.
Dr Giorgio Brunelli, of the Universita di Brescia, Italy, revealed details of the nerve-graft surgery at a conference in California.
It is rudimentary walking, but she can move
Dr Giorgio Brunelli
The woman's spinal cord was severed in a road accident.
But Dr Brunelli said that following surgery she has regained limited use of her legs.
In a 14-hour surgery performed in July 2000, Dr Brunelli removed a portion of the 28-year-old's sciatic nerve and used it as a graft to connect the undamaged portion of her spine to muscles in her buttocks and thighs.
He said the graft allowed the regrowth of nerves connected to the central nervous system into the muscle tissue.
The unidentified patient first showed movement in her legs in September.
Dr Brunelli said she had since begun walking with assistance.
Prior to surgery she had been wheelchair-bound for five years.
Dr Brunelli said: "It is rudimentary walking - she needs a walker - but she can move."
Scepticism
However, some doctors are sceptical about the procedure.
Dr Wise Young, of Rutgers University, has followed the research.
We shouldn't be jumping the gun
Dr Dalto Dietrich
He said the permanent severing of the sciatic nerve guarantees a patient loses use of the leg muscle - something that may cause problems if better treatments are eventually found.
Dr Young said: "If the procedure fails, this is a very major loss.
"This concept (that) patients have nothing to lose is terribly wrong.
"One shouldn't assume we will have no therapies for spinal cord injury forever - and this is a 28-year-old woman."
Another spinal cord expert criticised the surgery, never before performed in humans, as ethically questionable.
Caution
Dr Dalto Dietrich, of the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, said: "Unless you do a very controlled clinical trial, many times you get fooled.
"We shouldn't be jumping the gun. There is a major ethical question about doing these types of procedures in people until there is compelling evidence this is the answer to the problem."
Dr Brunelli wrangled with a medical ethics board in Italy for several years before he received approval to perform the operation.
He said he has experimented on more than 1,000 rats and 40 primates since 1980.
And although he stressed that the surgery is experimental, he plans to operate on a second patient next month.
"I will not give any illusions to patients," he said.
Paul Smith, executive director of the UK Spinal Injuries Association, said the woman's case left a lot of questions unanswered.
He said some people with spinal injuries recovered mobility naturally. The prospects depended to a large extent on whether the spinal cord was completely, or only partially severed.
Mr Smith told BBC News Online: "If this worked, and the woman has a better quality of life, then that is brilliant.
"But it does not mean that it is going to work for everybody, and it would be wrong to raise people's expectations. Lots of people have tried things and sort of regretted it later."
Dr Brunelli presented a video of the woman walking at a meeting of the International Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology in San Diego.