Evan Kass又在继续造谣,还是请版主亲自回复吧
所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛
送交者: 羽矢 于 2010-09-26, 10:15:12:
Evan Kass MD Chief of Pediatric Urology Beaumont Children's Hospital
Unfortunately, there are those who would try to convict Dr Xiao without evidence or a fair judgement of the evidence by his peers. Jian Ping's comments are typical of those who would convict an innocent man without a fair and honest view of the evidence. Certainly, I defend Dr Xiao because he is, in my opinion, an honest hardworking scientist and surgeon. I have personally witnessed Dr Xiao doing his surgery and must say that he is an exceptionally gifted surgeon who would be successful in any country in the world. He did not need to falsify data to justify his procedure and I can tell you honestly that his procedure has worked wonderfully in some of our patients. Does it work for every child with spina bifida? Certainly not. Can we sub-select patients who would do better than others? Absolutely. That is the purpose of our study, and those that would criticize our methodology or the fact that Dr Xiao's procedure has some validity have to do more than simply bark at the moon. Our study at Beaumont has passed through multiple reviews both internally and externally before we were able to enroll patients, and anyone who tries to criticize our methodology, obviously is not objective and one must certainly question their motivations. As to the charge of assault, it is obvious that I, nor anyone on this blog knows the truth, but if you follow the career of Mr Fang, one should be very suspicious of any charges that Mr fang makes, because he is a man possessed by the need for revenge. If one chooses the side of a man who has been charged with plagerism, lost his counterclaim in court and has spent the last several years trying to destroy the career of the man he suspects of reporting him for falsifying data, then one certainly has to question that persons judgement. I choose to defend an honorable man that I know is a gifted surgeon, hard working scientist and a gentle kind soul. Could he have been pushed to his limit by a man who has harassed him at every turn and has tried to ruin his good reputation? Perhaps. Anyone can be pushed beyond the point of no return if they are constantly bombarded with false accusations, but, in my opinion, I do not think Dr Xiao is capable of such an action. Dr Xiao, despite all of the attempts of Mr Fang to discredit him continues to be a well respected person throughout the world and is not a desperate man. Most of us in the scientific community have read the ravings of Mr Fang and dismissed them as the words of a man hell bent on revenge. We would not be surprised if he engineered this whole event.
Yesterday, 9:40:44 PM
所有跟贴:
- 我猜以前国内很多“脊柱裂专家” - 伊犁 (329 bytes) 2010-09-26, 13:44:08 (492408)
- 指出Kass的病人选择是基于肖在中国的无选择性小白鼠式的手术之上, - anti (121 bytes) 2010-09-26, 12:13:46 (492390)
- 好像没人建议采取法律措施,为什么对白大哥就只有驳斥告诉他的上级。 - 插一腿 (114 bytes) 2010-09-26, 12:03:21 (492386)
- 方先生应该回信 - Eiin (134 bytes) 2010-09-26, 11:34:01 (492370)
- 那里连圆排骨这种匿名造谣都放出来,成粪坑了,懒得理了 (无内容) - 方舟子 (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 11:28:39 (492365)
- 这个信息很有用,可以请Evan Kass证实。 - 元江 (1388 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:59:39 (492356)
- 此人在指控方舟子涉嫌刑事犯罪 - 羽矢 (59 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:55:45 (492355)
- 现在评论进来了不少蛆成了臭水沟,我建议版主不回,要么直接写份声明给科学 (无内容) - jhuang (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:52:11 (492354)
- 看到他的评论之后很气愤,拟了一份回复。 - lightman (2076 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:37:05 (492350)
- 写得很好! - JJT (117 bytes) 2010-09-26, 16:11:26 (492475)
- 在回他时,指出他们有共同的利益, 他的臆断不客观就行了, 不用多说。 (无内容) - anti (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:32:36 (492348)
- 赞同! (无内容) - coubert (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:33:30 (492349)
- 建议把彭律师的调查结果翻译出来回驳 - hd10 (1571 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:32:33 (492347)
- 争锋相对驳斥KASS的谣言是必须的。 再进一步的话和行动是得不偿失的。 - JFF (64 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:25:55 (492342)
- 很惊讶他根据个人对肖的印象,得出这么多荒谬的推论。很不严谨。 (无内容) - coubert (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:23:28 (492341)
- 利益关系,肖被捕,此人将损失惨重,急疯了。 (无内容) - Tom (0 bytes) 2010-09-26, 10:21:37 (492340)
加跟贴