送交者: qtl 于 2010-09-09, 05:44:33:

回答: then maybe you should try &v instead of v. 由 ak70 于 2010-09-09, 05:36:21:

• yes, but maybe you should try to use the pointer to pointers - ak70 (82 bytes) 2010-09-09, 05:49:23 (484706)
  • your this suggestion is wrong anyway - qtl (40 bytes) 2010-09-09, 05:51:39 (484707)
    • if use &v, then **v will be passed - qtl (25 bytes) 2010-09-09, 06:01:24 (484710)
    • what was the problem? (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2010-09-09, 05:59:29 (484709)

加跟贴