Wang统计的中国数据的问题是,台站数目对不上,位置有移动,历史数据有欠缺。


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Amsel 于 2010-02-08, 20:00:19:

回答: IPCC-WG1报告是对论文的汇总,而自己并没分析“原始”数据 由 疫苗 于 2010-02-08, 19:50:44:

被公开的一封邮件里面,Tom Wigley写给Jones 的有这样一封:
引用:
"I have always thought W-C W [wang] was a rather sloppy scientist. I therefore would not be surprised if he screwed up here … Why, why, why did you and W-C W not simply say this right at the start? Perhaps it's not too late? I realise that Keenan is just a troublemaker and out to waste time, so I apologize for continuing to waste your time on this, Phil. However, I *am* concerned because all this happened under my watch as director of CRU and, although this is unlikely, the buck eventually should stop with me."

可见问题之严重。

IPCC报告问题出得最严重的是WG2,这一组负责恐吓公众全球变暖的后果;因为没有足够的Peer reviewed研究结论,他们就东抄西抄,什么喜马拉雅冰川2035年消融,气象灾害,北非粮食减产一半,都是WG2搞出来的。




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明