简单几句介绍一下武汉官司，指出以下事实（给读者看，不是为了辩论）：

How did Dr. Xiao win the lawsuit in Wuhan? look at the court findings:

The defendant Fang could not find the plaintiff's name on the list of award winners can not deny the fact that the plaintiff won the award. Therefore, it is an established fact that the plaintiff has won the America Urological Association Achievement Award.

Here is where Dr. Xiao braged he won the Award:
http://www.hlhl.org.cn/english/showsub.asp?id=476
2000:      America Urological Association Achievement Award

Here is the recipients of AUA Achievement Award:
http://www.auanet.org/content/about-us/awards.cfm?sub=CA

另外，肖传国先后针对方舟子共发起9起官司。

肖传国曾在美国涉及至少四起民事官司。
Note the first one, XIAO,CHUANGUO vs. WARDEN, it means Dr. Xiao was once put in jail.

Court: Bronx Civil Supreme
Index Number: 001374/1993
Case Name: XIAO,CHUANGUO vs. WARDEN
Case Type: Other Torts

Court: New York Civil Supreme
Index Number: 100153/2003
Case Name: XIAO, M.D., CHUAN-GUO vs. CONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS
Case Type: Other Torts

Court: Kings Civil Supreme
Index Number: 022422/1997
Case Name: CALI,LUCY AVELENDA & ROSS vs. XIAO,CHAUN GUO
Case Type: Motor Vehicle

Court: New York Civil Supreme
Index Number: 072143/1992
Case Name: YUAN, WEI vs. XIAO, CHUANGUO
Case Type: Contested Matrimonial

This one shows under what circumstance did Dr. Xao invent his procedure:
http://vlex.com/vid/chuan-guo-xiao-continuum-18536135
Plaintiff alleged that LICH discriminated against him on the basis of his Chinese national origin by terminating his employment as a research director; by forcing him to work in a laboratory that was used for the storage of paint, tiles, and windows; by refusing to relocate him from a building that was closed by LICH; by not providing him with a contract; and by not paying him for work he performed in China