I think it's just a simple matter of cost-per-unit-volum

I think it's just a simple matter of cost-per-unit-volum

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 虎子于 2010-06-15, 12:37:35:

回答: 那同样道理为什么不能造波音７４７那样大的战斗机多装点各种武器由 HHS 于 2010-06-15, 12:31:02:

Adding one cubic meter to an airplane is much more expensive than adding the same volume to a ship.

Of course this is "runtime" cost we're talking about.

一架波音大飞机好象和一架战斗机价格差不多一个数量级的 (无内容) - HHS (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:40:51 (453027)
- Notice that this is cost-per-unit-volume - 虎子 (161 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:43:52 (453029)
  - 因为不造大战斗机的alternative是造许多小战斗机，所以当然要比叫大飞机和小飞机 (无内容) - HHS (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:49:04 (453031)
    - But airplane was not in your original question (无内容) - 虎子 (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 13:44:20 (453040)
      - I take that back. What I mean is that in your question - 虎子 (86 bytes) 2010-06-15, 13:46:03 (453042)
  - And I think shouqilouzi was right - 虎子 (71 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:46:30 (453030)