https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B92CyI7iP9pqYmE5Njg4NWQtZGI0MS00ZDNiLWEzM2MtZmY2ZTc4MzdkYTc3&hl=en&pli=1关心科学和政策之间的关系的可以看一下这个实例。
作者之一是ROGER PIELKE JR，这是他的博客：
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/他一直认为气候政策和气候争论本来没什么关系，比如这段对Mann非常不恭的文字：
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/05/picking-cherries-and-hot-fudge.htmlLet me be very clear about what I mean by this: My views on climate policy are not sensitive to any of the information presented in IPCC TAR 2.21. The Hockey Stick could be rotated 180 degrees or mirror-imaged or shaken like a jump-rope and it would not alter my views of climate policy one bit. When, back in 2005, I asked Steve McIntyre and some of his critics at Real Climate about why the debate matters for climate policy, there seemed to be a consensus that that time that it did not.
这个报告英文版和更多的背景都可以看这个博客。