no sense to talk about probability in HHS and mangolasi's exsamples


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: conner 于 2010-04-22, 10:25:21:

I doubt now if HHS is not as good as the old hunhunsheng.
http://www.xys.org/forum/db/6/171/237.html
http://www.xys.org/forum/db/6/172/32.html
Probability is about measure of event.
引用:
In probability theory, an event is a set of outcomes (a subset of the sample space) to which a probability is assigned. Typically, when the sample space is finite, any subset of the sample space is an event (i.e. all elements of the power set of the sample space are defined as events). However, this approach does not work well in cases where the sample space is infinite, most notably when the outcome is a real number. So, when defining a probability space it is possible, and often necessary, to exclude certain subsets of the sample space from being events (see Events in probability spaces, below).

引用:
Defining all subsets of the sample space as events works well when there are only finitely many outcomes, but gives rise to problems when the sample space is infinite. For many standard probability distributions, such as the normal distribution the sample space is the set of real numbers or some subset of the real numbers. Attempts to define probabilities for all subsets of the real numbers run into difficulties when one considers 'badly-behaved' sets, such as those which are nonmeasurable. Hence, it is necessary to restrict attention to a more limited family of subsets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(probability_theory)



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明