"市场经济本来讲的就是开放" that's government behavior



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: skipper3 于 2005-2-24, 13:00:20:

回答: 你搞混了吧。 由 bluesea 于 2005-2-24, 12:42:10:

not individual companies'. A company must do the opposite to gain competitive advantage, otehrwise its management team must be fired.

It's up to debate why Apple Computer fails. But this is a WenKe issue it's not as simple as to observe the effect then work back to find a casue. There are many reasons why it failed, architecture is one of them.

Case in study: have you heard about NTT DoCoMo? It's the only (or the only dominating) Jappenese wireless vendor/carrier/service provider. They use weird standard incompatible to popular GSM and CDMA. How is it doing today? They enjoy huge success and Jappenese subscribers enjoy vertically integrated services from voice to data to email to mobile E-commerce. They even provide after sales service to things sold via mobile E-commerce. And they are making good maney. Now you look at NA market. You get it deregulated, you get all open standards and open market all state of the art technology. What is the effect so far? You get a fragmented market, service are still prmitive: voice + simple data, mobile E-commerce is barely on the angenda.

So when you think about a WenKe problem don't confine yourself into "becasue...therefore".



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl