强辞夺理。即使英文polarization定义也不是如你所说的。

送交者: james_hussein_bond 于 2009-04-13, 23:43:10:

回答: 不叫偏振光不等于没有偏振性，由 LB 于 2009-04-13, 23:27:17:

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PETROLGY/GENLIGHT.HTM

引用：

Although we often speak of "unpolarized" light, every photon of light is polarized in some manner. "Unpolarized" light is a random mixture of light of all polarizations. When light has an easily observed dominant polarization, we refer to it as polarized.

注意这里讲的是＂每个光子都是偏振的，＂而不是象007所说＂所有光都是偏振的。＂

所有跟贴:

用不着光子，008不就是说E是个矢量嘛。007你太骄傲啦！ (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2009-04-13, 23:49:55 (313767)
- 照你这么说，unpolarized light这个概念不存在了？ - james_hussein_bond (24 bytes) 2009-04-13, 23:56:15 (313769)

加跟贴