are you sure it's implementation dependent?

are you sure it's implementation dependent?

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: eng 于 2009-03-14, 09:55:58:

回答: because this type of expression is ambiguous and in many case 由 steven 于 2009-03-14, 04:11:23:

operator precedence is well defined in ANSI C. It's only ambiguous to human eyes.

not the operator precedence, the order of expressions being evaluated - steven (60 bytes) 2009-03-14, 11:58:45 (306470)
- are you sure? += is not treated the same way as = as far as I can see (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2009-03-14, 13:46:50 (306520)
  - C99 draft (ISO/IEC 9899:TC3), Ch. 6.5.16 Assignment operators - steven (325 bytes) 2009-03-14, 14:20:24 (306539)
    - it got messed up from cut & paste from pdf, but you should get the idea. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2009-03-14, 15:00:42 (306549)
Then MAster Tan was blameless here - bu3bu4 (28 bytes) 2009-03-14, 10:31:40 (306435)