就看怎么定义了

送交者: 鹏归于 2009-01-20, 01:45:32:

回答: 田野和漫画上那个小哲学家一样，把是否发生过与是否被检测到混为一谈了由方舟子于 2009-01-20, 01:20:13:

英文里SOUND 是
a.Vibrations transmitted through an elastic solid or a liquid or gas, with frequencies in the approximate range of 20 to 20,000 hertz, capable of being detected by human organs of hearing.
b. Transmitted vibrations of any frequency.
c. The sensation stimulated in the organs of hearing by such vibrations in the air or other medium.
d. Such sensations considered as a group.

而田野说的声音是听觉对声波的反应,对应上边的C,D.

所有跟贴:

即使用后两种定义，那蚊虫鸟兽听到的算不算？ (无内容) - whoami (0 bytes) 2009-01-20, 03:49:33 (294279)
说道这个我就有个发明了。 - bluesea (287 bytes) 2009-01-20, 02:22:42 (294266)
- 还用得着你发明？ - whoami (30 bytes) 2009-01-20, 03:17:10 (294275)
这些百科知识算培根时代的特征。现在专业化了，一下子就讲清楚，没多少好讨论了 (无内容) - 投影 (0 bytes) 2009-01-20, 02:06:14 (294260)
- 问题出在大家用同一个名词表示不同的内容 - 鹏归 (45 bytes) 2009-01-20, 02:10:53 (294261)
  - 知道你的意思。很多事情是概念定义不一样。弄清楚了就没什么好争论了 (无内容) - 投影 (0 bytes) 2009-01-20, 02:15:08 (294263)

加跟贴