哈哈,这个Klose太荒唐。他的上一个卫星,是讲澳大利亚某次地震是


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Amsel 于 2009-01-17, 19:31:36:

回答: 他的这个摘要查到了。如果这个话题炒起来,怎么回答应该是水博他们的活儿。 由 Amsel 于 2009-01-17, 15:28:03:

200多年的挖煤造成的,真是匪夷所思。(后来有澳大利亚学者的逐点批驳和他的reply)。

Science采访他和范晓,不考虑他们在本行的声誉,这属于吸引眼球的行为,很不光彩。

引用:
Abstract
On the basis of a numerical simulation, Klose [earth planet. sci. lett. 256: 547╟553 (2007)] proposed that the MW=5.2–5.6 earthquake that
nucleated beneath Newcastle (New South Wales, Australia) at 10.30 AM December 28, 1989 (AEST), was the result of 200yr of coal mining in
the region. We argue here that Klose's [earth planet. sci. lett. 256: 547╟553 (2007)] ultimate conclusion is not supported by his own model or by
available geological and seismic data. In particular, the 1989 Newcastle earthquake was not anomalous with respect to regional seismic activity.
Crown Copyright © 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: 1989 Newcastle earthquake; mining-induced seismicity; coal mining; Sydney Basin; Hunter; Australia




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明