送交者: blackbox 于 2008-12-24, 10:17:48:

回答: not as what that article said. 由 steven 于 2008-12-24, 10:09:23:

• don't misunderestimate the stupidity. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-12-24, 10:50:05 (287329)
  • why don't you point out the stupid statement in the artical - blackbox (67 bytes) 2008-12-24, 10:59:36 (287334)
    • MD5 and SHA-1 are not even "code" or encryption. You don't know - steven (15 bytes) 2008-12-24, 11:04:53 (287336)
      • 不要强词夺理，文章中对SHA-1和MD5都是叫“密码算法"，有什么问题吗 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2008-12-24, 11:16:03 (287338)
        • what is 密码算法? To show a collision of a hash function in 2^63 - steven (51 bytes) 2008-12-24, 11:46:55 (287348)
          • 我看了半天就会这几招，文中记者是"破解"不是"破译" - 4U4luC2 (272 bytes) 2008-12-24, 12:00:57 (287359)
            • 我看了半天你就会死打蛮缠这几招，文中记者用的是"破解"不是"破译" - 4U4luC2 (280 bytes) 2008-12-24, 12:03:03 (287361)
              • 好像是你太把一篇新闻当回事了 - 4U4luC2 (211 bytes) 2008-12-24, 14:24:20 (287460)
              • 这种垃圾文章你也会拿来当会事？ (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-12-24, 13:49:39 (287437)
              • OK, 就事论事:"破解", "破译"可以, 不要破骂了, both of you. (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-12-24, 12:19:28 (287375)

加跟贴