Your didn't remember it correctly.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2008-12-23, 11:35:23:

回答: founded by DoD doesn't make it a 军用项目 由 eng 于 2008-12-23, 09:35:38:

First of all it wasn't developed at Berkeley. UCB wrote the socket layer and that isn't IP. IP was created at UCLA and Stanford in 1969. Secondly, there have always been universities in the US working for military project, including the most of one Manhattan project, at Univ. of Chicago. Projects developed in an university does not disqualify itself from being a military project.

The IP architecture was funded by DARPA to create the network infrastructure for the military. That is why there is a .mil domain. The military internal network runs standard TCP/IP, but physically separated from the so-called internet. There are military specific reasons. There are many short coming, and the biggest one is addressing and routing. Because the architecture limitation, the framework has to be changed, redesigned, and become IPv6 which is not compatible with the current IP protocol. That is what you called a architectural short-coming. However, IPsec can be, and has been, implemented on IPv4, and the architecture can handle it without altering the whole network infrastructure. That is, from engineering perspective, the design did take network security into account.

I didn't mean to say IPv4 is perfect, but majority of the attack does not attack the network infrastructure, but the end-user nodes. There is a difference. There are a couple of attacks including attacking DNS, and IP fragmentation attacks etc. There are many areas in network security need works, a lot of works, but that doesn't mean security wasn't a consideration at all at first.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明