武松打虎 was not because that was a tiger.



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: BT 于 2005-2-09, 16:56:33:

回答: 何作庥"老虎吃人,该不该打"的悖论. 由 hah 于 2005-2-09, 15:37:47:

He was self defense. He would have killed it even if that was a human. And also that tiger had criminal record. So 武松 became a hero. 何 asked a silly question. 汪 was confused. 汪 should have asked back if the guy who killed a panda should not be punished.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl