It is a 共识 that Turing machine = algorithm
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: xinku 于 2008-01-09, 14:41:01:
It is not a 共识 that the brain is algorithmic
所有跟贴:
Turing machine 常不能解出微分方程的解析解,例如. (无内容)
-
短江学者
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 14:47:01
(196913)
MatLab 可以给出许多方程的解析解呢 (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 14:54:36
(196919)
所以说"常"而非"都".clever tricks are beyond machine now.
-
短江学者
(110 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:00:15
(196925)
but you cannot say machines cannot have their "mind" by essence
-
xinku
(56 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:02:38
(196927)
I didn't say that. I think they will. I just try to say
-
短江学者
(57 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:07:11
(196931)
如果你相信所有自然现象都归结为量子现象,而量子效应是离散的,二进制怎么啦? (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:15:34
(196936)
so what? human being can solve all equations? (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 14:48:47
(196914)
我是要说明algorithm定义不确. 如果认为获得解析解也算是algorithm的话. (无内容)
-
短江学者
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 14:55:24
(196921)
you don't know what you were talking about.
-
steven
(459 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:15:17
(196935)
algirithm's definition is very clear: the process of a Turing machine
-
xinku
(54 bytes)
2008-01-09, 14:57:45
(196924)
也有算法根据方程算出解析解?要举例吗?
-
短江学者
(51 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:05:20
(196929)
简单:一元二次方程
-
xinku
(76 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:09:21
(196932)
我意思我可以给很多例子机器无法得解析解的. (无内容)
-
短江学者
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:12:35
(196934)
You confused about this, and dead wrong.
-
steven
(56 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:17:50
(196938)
我可以给出很多例子,人也无法得出解析解 (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-09, 15:16:21
(196937)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)