I guess 008's point is that a number per se is a number only...

送交者: mangolasi 于 2008-01-08, 20:18:00:

回答: 008说的是对的。到底什么是随机也没有说法。由 apple 于 2008-01-08, 20:10:18:

but randomness has epistemic randomness and "true" randomness, but a computer as far as what we see can generate either. If you are a non-determinist like Roger Penrose, then the randomness consists both, and if you are a determinist like Steven Weinberg then all randomness is epistemic randomness. My 2 pence (yeah, .004 Americanopesos)...

所有跟贴:

you mean 23 is not a random number? I am disappointed. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-01-08, 21:15:16 (196760)
- everything written is random...even how we human write "2" looking - mangolasi (100 bytes) 2008-01-08, 21:24:04 (196761)
计算机不是哲学。比如计算机到目前为止不能简单模拟抛硬币。 - apple (76 bytes) 2008-01-08, 20:31:16 (196754)
- I think reasonably good approximation suffice...of course, this - mangolasi (151 bytes) 2008-01-08, 20:39:20 (196756)
  - Agree. 有计算机研究人员专门考虑如何逼近公认的随机。 (无内容) - apple (0 bytes) 2008-01-08, 20:50:21 (196757)
.04 Americanopesos...poor arithmetic... (无内容) - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2008-01-08, 20:18:48 (196750)

加跟贴