《为什么夜空是黑暗的？》读后感

送交者: chouqilozi 于 2008-02-27, 08:59:44:

方博士的文章越来越通俗易懂了，让我想起高德纳（DANOLD　KNUTH）关于怎样交流的箴言:if you lecture to a layman, you communicate with your peer; if you lecture to your peer, you communicate with no one. (大意如此。)班主能把科普写得这么清楚，肯定是把读者想成幼儿园小胖友了。
另一个感想就是这个诗人爱伦坡咋这么能琢磨呢？可能是理呆错入文傻的行当了。

所有跟贴:

这个爱伦坡是那个写侦探小说的？ (无内容) - alpha000001 (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 09:49:49 (208808)
- 好象主要写诗 (无内容) - chouqilozi (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 09:52:27 (208810)
  - 以前很少看课外书，所以只是在看《福尔摩斯》 - alpha000001 (60 bytes) 2008-02-27, 10:25:13 (208822)
it is the density of the stars, not quantity - outsider (48 bytes) 2008-02-27, 09:35:44 (208803)
- it is the brightness of the star, not the density or quantity that.... (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 10:04:59 (208815)
  - Why not density? (无内容) - outsider (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 10:27:52 (208823)
    - stars block each other (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 12:02:35 (208846)
      - There is certain degree of blocking but - outsider (112 bytes) 2008-02-27, 13:02:52 (208856)
太阳出来又落山，论坛永远是黑暗 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 09:21:10 (208795)
- 太阳出来又落山，论坛永远是昏暗 (无内容) - chouqilozi (0 bytes) 2008-02-27, 09:31:22 (208802)

加跟贴