这下捞到宝了,英国人也批评 Steven Spielberg


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 过客1234 于 2008-02-20, 15:19:03:

不看原文,还以为这个“Socialist Worker”小报(据WIKI说不到8000的发行量)是很亲中的。原文一大段对中国不太客气的话(甚至将中国与美国并列为帝国主义)传到了中国读者这里变成了不痛不痒的两个转折句。

China’s role in Darfur does not excuse US crimes
by Charlie Kimber
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=14223

引用:
There is no doubt that appalling suffering continues to take place in Darfur, and no doubt that China has given support to the Sudanese government at crucial moments.

But it is thoroughly simplistic to focus solely on the role of China. Both the US and China covet influence in Sudan as part of the new “scramble for Africa” which is taking place over natural resources, political influence and strategic territory.

Both imperial powers are far more interested in such factors than in the plight of Darfur’s people. Yet Spielberg does not even begin to question the US’s role in Africa.


英媒:斯皮尔伯格为什么不去批评美国?
http://china.huanqiu.com/eyes_on_china/2008-02/62606.html

引用:
不过,将达尔富尔问题仅归咎于中国也过于简单化了。美国和中国都希望对苏丹有影响力,可是,斯皮尔伯格却没有对美国在非洲的角色提出任何质疑。




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明