送交者: Wood 于 2008-02-04, 10:53:37:

回答: 老方的新文章中的一点疑问 由 smartsz 于 2008-02-04, 10:04:44:

• 不但母乳没有细菌好像健康人的尿液也不该有细菌 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 10:57:33 (203061)
  • HOW do mammals sterilize their urine? Why do they have to? (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:03:51 (203068)
    • 这种体液是从体内来的体内没有细菌(严格意义上讲消化道不算体内) - HunHunSheng (42 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:08:11 (203072)
      • caught bacteria as it comes out, urinal track can be infected by H. pylori (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:13:58 (203078)
        • you shouldn't count infection. they are talking about - Enlighten (68 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:37:52 (203088)
          • 明白人啊！ (无内容) - smartsz (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:41:10 (203092)
            • 人家说俺就爱打叉 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 12:50:44 (203112)
  • 就差没说米田共也是无菌的 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:00:13 (203064)
• through second milk. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 10:54:19 (203058)
  • and tell us why you need to do that (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:08:46 (203073)
    • soz, wrong end (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 11:15:19 (203080)
  • 2nd milk isn't bacteria-free either, tho they might hav prettier knockers (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 10:58:07 (203062)

加跟贴