You missed the point. No one is trying to replace the experimental
所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛
送交者: 肥肥 于 2008-01-03, 17:43:56:
回答: 肥肥你那观点已经老掉牙了 由 008 于 2008-01-03, 17:33:23:
method with anything else. From a pragmatic point of view, it is indeed the most effective method. The
quine-dehum thesis merely warns us that we should
not take for granted that with repeated and "revised"
experiments, our theory will converge to the truh.
It may actually veer in the oppositie direction.
所有跟贴:
加跟贴