青蛙跳的那个试验本来是数学家拿来揶揄生物学家的笑话
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: xinku 于 2008-01-03, 15:15:47:
可是数学家生病了都知道去看医生,谁也不会拿笑话当真。
肥肥转的文章里故意忽略那个著名的剃刀原理,让人怀疑动机
不纯。
加上剃刀原理,人类的认知过程应当是收敛到绝对真理的,这
一点好像计算机科学里都有证明了,steven, 是不是这样?
所有跟贴:
没听说过。加上奥氏剃刀原理就能保证实验筛选过程无穷逼近
-
肥肥
(8 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:27:43
(195615)
Why not? I am an optimist ;-) (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:36:40
(195620)
我只想知道有无这个结论的数学证明。 (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:02:10
(195625)
我也不是太清楚,因为这涉及到给人类认知过程建数学模型
-
xinku
(389 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:19:58
(195633)
仁者见仁,智者见智, 胡说八道者又见些什么? (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:25:34
(195639)
胡说八道 cannot prove you know what you are talking (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:34:26
(195645)
呵呵,有趣。 (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:21:39
(195636)
don't know. Mathematics only shows it is impossible to know everything.
-
steven
(92 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:19:03
(195606)
柏拉图主义数学家都追求绝对真理,即柏拉图王国的真理。 (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:48:13
(195624)
数学只是说recursive enumable axiom set is impossible to infer every true thing
-
xinku
(476 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:32:04
(195618)
if what you said is true, then halting problem is solvable. (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:37:38
(195621)
it is solvable by human beings
-
xinku
(78 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:44:02
(195622)
which human being?
-
steven
(187 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:06:38
(195628)
I am not afraid of any "mistake"
-
xinku
(154 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:12:47
(195629)
You don't know what you're talking about.
-
steven
(173 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:23:53
(195638)
I learned the halting problem and proved its unsolvable
-
xinku
(159 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:32:44
(195642)
you mean program doesn't change its mind? if so, you won't
-
steven
(208 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:37:41
(195649)
Your argument shows that
-
xinku
(75 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:40:50
(195652)
有没有mind根本不是问题,问题是推理的方法是否一样。
-
apple
(109 bytes)
2008-01-03, 18:01:55
(195680)
I meant if you don't recognize ... (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:46:47
(195655)
so if you recognized supernatural creation, human mind
-
steven
(93 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:43:55
(195654)
也就是人类思维的Unpredictability.这种思维一般来自两种人:天才
-
肥肥
(6 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:34:08
(195644)
Partially agreed。人类的思维过程有两种:一种是异想天开的创造性
-
肥肥
(173 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:30:56
(195641)
胡扯淡。 (无内容)
-
apple
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 17:58:37
(195678)
Run a random number generator before taking the next step
-
steven
(28 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:33:59
(195643)
is there any "true" random number generator?
-
xinku
(63 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:36:31
(195648)
两害相权取其轻。我决定无条件同意Steve的观点,并愿意
-
肥肥
(20 bytes)
2008-01-03, 17:39:25
(195665)
仔细想了一下。如果我承认哥德尔定理适用于人类对打自然的探索,
-
肥肥
(229 bytes)
2008-01-03, 17:18:23
(195661)
algorithm and randomized algorithm functionally are the same.
-
steven
(146 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:41:56
(195653)
乖乖!你开始问起爱因斯坦的问题了:上帝掷筛骰子吗? (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:38:23
(195650)
纯粹自然的随机序列没有目的性。和人的创造性思维有本质不同 (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:35:26
(195647)
then added a selection functions, with a list of critiria. Does that
-
steven
(18 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:38:57
(195651)
therefore it is NOT constrained by any computer. sorry ;-) (无内容)
-
xinku
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:20:41
(195635)
怪不得忽悠了我半天不敢开口问你:to be or not to be (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:22:41
(195637)
Bingo. 哥德尔不完备定理 (无内容)
-
肥肥
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:24:26
(195612)
Godel's theorem only applies to recursive enumerable sets. (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2008-01-03, 15:29:20
(195616)
人们对物理世界的认识过程也可以用recursive enumerable sets
-
肥肥
(57 bytes)
2008-01-03, 16:03:53
(195626)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)