送交者: suprathinker 于 2008-07-25, 20:41:44:

回答: 他算得淋雨量更是一塌糊涂 由 wasguru 于 2008-07-25, 19:17:17:

• 他的意思明显是水平平板 (无内容) - 领海涛声 (0 bytes) 2008-07-25, 21:05:05 (245531)
  • 或者要考虑尺缩效应？ (无内容) - 领海涛声 (0 bytes) 2008-07-25, 21:07:31 (245532)
    • In which reference frame? (无内容) - wasguru (0 bytes) 2008-07-25, 22:32:13 (245540)
      • Plate of course (无内容) - 领海涛声 (0 bytes) 2008-07-26, 14:32:47 (245624)
• Are you sure? (无内容) - wasguru (0 bytes) 2008-07-25, 20:57:39 (245527)
  • rain can't generally be treated as continuous fluid. - suprathinker (524 bytes) 2008-07-26, 02:05:33 (245560)
    • 看来你没理解wasguru的意思. - 领海涛声 (36 bytes) 2008-07-26, 05:32:52 (245578)
      • Maybe I didn't understand wasguru well, but I agree with his verdict - suprathinker (296 bytes) 2008-07-26, 06:26:24 (245580)
        • cannot agree, but thanks for explaining. (无内容) - 领海涛声 (0 bytes) 2008-07-26, 14:24:18 (245622)

加跟贴