不能用纯概率的思维方式来说明second opinion from second doctor的作用
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: HunHunSheng 于 2008-04-26, 10:17:37:
Otherwise if two doctors are different in their opinion,
you still don't know whom to follow. If you randomly pick one doctor to trust, then the probablity of
misdiagnosis remain the same.
所有跟贴:
应该至少看三个医生然后听多数意见 (无内容)
-
HunHunSheng
(0 bytes)
2008-04-26, 10:22:50
(221496)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)