我觉得口气要再缓和点



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: 田牛 于 2005-12-28, 01:58:21:

回答: 关于老方的信,最后的最后一稿,欢迎讨论 由 xj 于 2005-12-28, 00:09:41:

开了七小时的车,进来一看发大水了。
我觉得口气要再缓和点,希望这封信作为读者来信登出来,它的读者是美国人。
我觉得easylx的建议有道理,写信的目的是陈述事实,不是跟着伪环保人士转移战场。在《纽约时报》给方舟子一个答复前,目前还不能把Jim Yardley定性为不良记者。
我建议更改以下两段:
Mr. Yardley interviewed me through email. Thus, had he paid any attention to the email in which I replied to his questions in December 7, 2005 (see the enclosure), many inaccuracies in his report could have been avoided. Apparently, he had completely ignored my opinions. Writing as if none of the opponents of the so-called "environmentalists" had answered his interview requests, and accepting rumors and lies spread by the "environmentalists" as facts, Mr. Yardley reported a one-sided story told by the "environmentalists."
Here I will correct some mistakes in Mr. Yardley's report, again.
换成类似:
Mr. Yardley contacted me on December 7, 2005 and wanted to interview me over the phone. He agreed my suggestion the interview be carried through emails. Mr. Yardley sent me the questions and I replied (see the enclosure). However, Mr. Yardley decided to ignore all the facts stated in my e-mail

To arrive at a more complete picture of "Public Voice on Nu River/Opinion", readers of the New York Times have the right to learn that ...





所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl