A peer-review procedure for XYS?



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: flour 于 2005-12-23, 17:13:20:

This is related to the "FaKeNi"'s article.

Could there be a pre-relase version of some "New material" articles so that the the selected members of this forum will review and recommmend its publication in the full release of "New material"?

This more cautous way will ensure the accuracy of XYS papers, before it reaches the half million readers. It can also get the involvement of XYS supports not only interms of contributing articles, but also ensuring their qualities.

I think some criticisms of XYS lies in a few papers with biased (even false) accusations. If such peer review process can be introduced, it will help to not let these few papers to destroy of whole reputation of the XYS journal.

I think as the chief editor, FZZ has the responsibility for such activities. It's probably not enough to say that "I put things out there and let people correct themsevles". Otherwise readers will loose confidence of the autheticity of every new papers.



所有跟贴:
  • 支持 - AtXYS (42 bytes) 2005-12-23, 17:32:07

    加跟贴

    笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

    标题:

    内容(可选项):

    URL(可选项):
    URL标题(可选项):
    图像(可选项):


    所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl