送交者: Enlighten 于 2005-2-02, 13:41:19:

回答: 原来是看了眼红的,个人利益最大化又是么不对?洗脑多了? 由 george 于 2005-2-02, 13:27:11:

个人利益最大化就别老挂着贡献祖国的招牌，又评什么模范。至少是虚伪。

• 他对国家有贡献,对自己也有好处,为什么不可以聘先进? - george (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:53:40
  • 莫名其妙,难道宣传就和自己说一样吗?雷锋的宣传不肉麻? - george (45 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:51:39
  • 这和那些“拒绝高薪聘请，毅然回国”的一样 - Enlighten (234 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:08:24
    • Now you are making more sense. - skipper3 (172 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:11:44
  • 你看不懂底下的贴？ - 沙漠不死鸟 (129 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:03:51
    • 做得好的表扬就说沽名钓誉,难怪在中国最多的是庸才 - george (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:08:42
      • 怎么破坏了,是不是因为他的实验室做得好妨碍了国内庸才的生财之道了? - george (12 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:16:11
        • 一点都不嫉妒 - 沙漠不死鸟 (337 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:27:48
          • 再说一点 - george (140 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:42:11
          • 只怕是没人愿意请吧? - george (97 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:38:30
          • 哦 - george (219 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:36:06
        • 这种“妒忌说”早被批臭了，你还当宝贝抱着。可怜。 - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:25:35
      • 破坏秩序，破坏程序，叫做的好？ - 沙漠不死鸟 (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:11:25
    • 做得好的表扬就说沽名钓誉,难怪在中国最多的是庸才 - george (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:08:38
• He did contribute a lot to USTC's physics. - george (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:28:29
• why not?! - skipper3 (221 bytes) 2005-2-02, 13:51:16
  • social cost of 又当婊子又立牌坊 is far greater than its benefit - Enlighten (50 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:00:37
    • It's the culture, ******! Latino2, it's time for - skipper3 (32 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:04:50
      • You both have good points. - Latino2 (161 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:14:21
      • it's not a culture unique to china, it's shared by other cultures - Enlighten (148 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:09:33
        • Please don't disappoint me by making claims not - skipper3 (141 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:17:24
          • You sure can do both. But you can't just say one. That's dishonest. - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:47:21
            • to me it's the same as a CEO projecting - skipper3 (348 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:59:48
              • Are you kidding? - Enlighten (336 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:14:56
                • I thin you are very nerdy. If you believe the Enron affair - skipper3 (68 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:26:00
                  • Wait, who's the principal and who's the agent in Pan's case? - Enlighten (163 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:30:46
                    • principal: gen. public, agent: Pan's employer and to some degree - skipper3 (12 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:44:33
                      • ok, i'll buy it for now. but it still doesn't justify lying to the public. - Enlighten (174 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:53:28
                  • "principal-agent problem" that is - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 15:28:38
  • 秃子头上的虱子 - 沙漠不死鸟 (53 bytes) 2005-2-02, 13:55:09
    • your claim is not scientific enough - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 13:57:25
      • your science is psydo-science - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:12:17
        • pseudo - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-2-02, 14:13:25

加跟贴