送交者: pococurante 于 2005-12-02, 07:15:31:
Suppose Bill O'Reilly reported some radical anti-American and Anti-Japanese activists (we have plenty of those copatriots) in China, and then commented: "See those Atheisistic Stupid Sino-ists (ASS)". Of course, he clearly defined that simply referes to those Chinese who is both atheists and holding very radical anti-Japanese/American view (slaughter in Tokyo, for example). "stupid" is nto a heavy word to discribe Tokyo Slaughter advocates. Then the term spreaded. Predictably, some people use in with abuse: they simply call a atheist Chinese as ASS, or even a atheist (of whatever race) or even a Chinese (with whatever faith). And of course, when the abuse comes out, people began to notice the term and protest. Mr. O'Reilly eventually comes out and say: "Hey, you guys are not watching Fox everyday! I had clearly defined the word narrowly in my O'Reilly Factor! It only applies those who deserve it. If you are not among those people, why are you being angry?" Yes, why should we being angry?