“只有数学有绝对的对,绝对的错”? sounds not like a mathematician.
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: Amsel 于 2007-12-21, 12:16:16:
There are also objects of “绝对的对,绝对的错” in other fields; and there are also objects not “绝对的对,绝对的错” in math.
所有跟贴:
只有数学可以自己定义对错 (无内容)
-
eddie
(0 bytes)
2007-12-21, 12:59:47
(193889)
No. Every field can "define" its own true or false.
-
Amsel
(169 bytes)
2007-12-21, 14:02:44
(193904)
No, I meant "to define"
-
eddie
(386 bytes)
2007-12-21, 14:32:38
(193913)
In an axiomatic system A, how do you define true or false for
-
steven
(62 bytes)
2007-12-21, 13:04:20
(193890)
Since it is not provable in A,, it must be true!
-
xinku
(16 bytes)
2007-12-21, 13:31:41
(193899)
You are confusing issues
-
eddie
(122 bytes)
2007-12-21, 13:08:53
(193892)
为什么昏昏就能定太极拳错? (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2007-12-21, 16:25:21
(193927)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)