送交者: steven 于 2007-10-26, 23:15:30:

回答: 兵法和下棋的棋法一样，沒有一个定理包你肯定赢 由 比目氏 于 2007-10-26, 21:47:03:

• 这根本不能成立 - 4U4luC2 (55 bytes) 2007-10-26, 23:20:19 (178821)
  • In game theory, a board game like chess or go is called sequential game. - steven (687 bytes) 2007-10-27, 01:32:03 (178825)
    • 结果你还是没绕出来,抄一大通sequential game的定义对回答这个问题没帮助 - 4U4luC2 (236 bytes) 2007-10-27, 09:18:28 (178842)
      • see tic-tac-toe, A moves first, and he will either win or draw. - steven (184 bytes) 2007-10-27, 10:39:35 (178845)
        • 不考虑有平局的游戏,取石子对抗胜负定义明确且非胜即负 - 4U4luC2 (90 bytes) 2007-10-27, 10:48:05 (178846)
          • A meaningful game implies the if the best strategies - steven (239 bytes) 2007-10-27, 10:58:48 (178848)
            • 这是一个饽论 - 4U4luC2 (80 bytes) 2007-10-27, 11:07:06 (178850)
              • What paradox? A game like that, either the first one to move or - steven (205 bytes) 2007-10-27, 15:08:40 (178878)
                • 回头再看看你的原帖,我就不和你再绕了 - 4U4luC2 (73 bytes) 2007-10-27, 16:07:52 (178882)
                  • never mind, this is going nowhere, I give up. (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-10-27, 20:26:25 (178911)
                  • as it said, if the game is meaningful, one side will definitely win. - steven (36 bytes) 2007-10-27, 17:37:47 (178889)
    • The problem is that you may not be able to decide one move ... - xinlihuaxys (190 bytes) 2007-10-27, 01:43:23 (178827)
      • btw, what do you doing how deep blue won Kasparov? - steven (75 bytes) 2007-10-27, 01:57:49 (178830)
        • The algorithm for deep blue is not brutal force. - xinlihuaxys (285 bytes) 2007-10-27, 02:46:24 (178834)
          • those 480 special chess chips were for searching... Deep blue choosed - steven (305 bytes) 2007-10-27, 02:53:58 (178835)
      • not really, like tic-tac-toe, where complete analysis is possible. - steven (155 bytes) 2007-10-27, 01:52:32 (178829)
  • 估计是谁先走谁赢 (无内容) - whoami (0 bytes) 2007-10-26, 23:52:25 (178823)
    • 那下面这个推断就更奇怪了 - 4U4luC2 (144 bytes) 2007-10-27, 00:08:04 (178824)
      • you don't know game theory, nor AI. see the post above. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-10-27, 01:32:53 (178826)
        • yawn. try something new next time (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-10-27, 09:29:39 (178843)

加跟贴