Before you make wild accusation (which seems to be your habit), you should read more carefully. Where did I say the decision was not a "just decision"? I was merely pointing out the fact (as an example to my article) such an important decision was based on a statistically insignificant difference. Whether it is "just" or not is not the topic of the article. It is politics, not mathematics, and I wisely stopped there, just to avoid people like you to jump out. If you don't understand mathematics or statistics, just say so. Don't change the subject.

I thought you knew better.