送交者: Wood 于 2007-08-23, 15:41:53:

• 反正小时候阅读金庸的会有很大一部分会真的认为武术会有那样的水平 - HunHunSheng (30 bytes) 2007-08-23, 16:19:36 (165053)
• for young people, - Wood (433 bytes) 2007-08-23, 15:51:49 (165030)
  • 三国演义，水浒，西游记 were wrtten to educated teenagers in schools? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-08-23, 15:58:53 (165038)
    • these are better written than 金庸武侠 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-08-23, 16:00:34 (165040)
      • better or not is irrelevent. The question was if they were written to - steven (30 bytes) 2007-08-23, 16:18:06 (165050)
• so do 三国演义，水浒，西游记。 (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-08-23, 15:44:48 (165023)
  • you can include them, but not 金庸小说 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-08-23, 15:54:18 (165035)
    • why not? because you don't like them? - steven (147 bytes) 2007-08-23, 16:20:40 (165054)
      • violent or sex should be censured for high school textbooks (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-08-23, 16:48:21 (165073)
        • so 三国演义，水浒，西游记, 红楼梦, 西厢记 should all be censured - steven (26 bytes) 2007-08-23, 18:05:24 (165099)
          • parts that contain extreme violence or sexual implications are - Wood (148 bytes) 2007-08-24, 00:32:06 (165159)
            • Please list evidence to support your claim. Besides, who makes - steven (248 bytes) 2007-08-24, 02:36:12 (165165)

加跟贴