a blunder


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: daye 于 2007-07-24, 12:09:19:

回答: 大概不会是私拆 由 eddie 于 2007-07-24, 08:35:17:

As I recall what I read years ago: the letter was returned to the Blood Inst because of vague address by the post office. It uses an official envelop with the Blood Inst return address, but no senders' names, etc. As a result, it ends up in the reception desk, and happened to draw attention of the director.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明