until these environmentalists' agenda can be evaluated based on their



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: skipper3 于 2005-9-14, 16:50:32:

回答: 香港文汇报:两院士上书胡温促怒江工程复工 由 Yush 于 2005-9-14, 15:49:27:

interest, which is yet to be fully recognized, instead of their credential, this debate will remain to be an ugly dog fight. If this trend goes on, it will hinder China's development towards an open and transparent society. I say NGO is one of the best things chinese have got since 6-4. Demonizing someone who does not share the same value with you is a negative political tactics which will surely backfire. In the future there will be more such organizations, trade/professional association for example, lobbying the government. One needs to get used to this.

Government environmental decision can't be based on right or wrong because only future generations can PROVE who is right and wrong. I say anyone who claims he can prove he is right others are wrong on this issue is likely not telling the whole truth.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl