送交者: Yush 于 2005-9-08, 15:44:41:
回答: 华尔街日报对圆明园事件报道的更正 由 Yush 于 2005-9-08, 15:19:28:
Yush于2005年8月28日发出的邮件（中文翻译）：
------------------------------------------------
亲爱的编辑:
我愿向您推荐两篇针对贵报8月26日头版《北京宫廷园林环境整治工程止步》（作者凯西·陈）的评论文章。这两篇文章声称，贵报文章包含错误虚假信息，缺乏公平客观公正。虽然这两篇文章是中文的，但我相信贵报部分员工，至少陈女士能够看明白。
谨启
xxx (Yush)
另，两篇文章见设于美国的中文网站“新语丝”：
http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/sohu/zhangzhengchun2.txt
http://www.xys.org/xys/ebooks/others/science/dajia6/yuanmingyuan110.txt
华尔街日报于2005年9月8日的回复（中文翻译）：
--------------------------------
亲爱的xxx:
感谢您的电子邮件。以下所附的更正已于9月6日发表。
谨启
华尔街日报新闻编辑Karen Miller Pensiero
更正与补充
2005年9月6日华尔街日报英文A2版
（略）
往来邮件英文原文：
--------------------------------
From: "readersfeedback"
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:13:20 -0400
To:
Subject: RE: Comments on Fixing Up Grounds Around Beijing Palace Is No Walk in Park, Auguest 26
Dear xxx:
Thank you for your email. A correction, which I've attached below, was published on Sept. 6.
Sincerely,
Karen Miller Pensiero
News Editor
The Wall Street Journal.
Corrections & Amplifications
6 September 2005
The Wall Street Journal
A2
English
THE YUANMINGYUAN PALACE in Beijing was burned down in 1860 by British and French armies, and the grounds were looted in 1900 by a joint army represented by eight countries. An Aug. 26 page-one article on a controversy over the grounds incorrectly said the palace was burned down in 1900. In addition, Zhang Zhengchun is affiliated with a university's life sciences department, but has never been officially employed as a professor. In the article, Mr. Zhang was incorrectly identified as a professor, based on erroneous information that he provided. Mr. Zhang and a colleague later said he was undergoing a joint research project with the university under the name of visiting professor, but was never officially appointed to such a position.
-----Original Message-----
From: xxx [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 2:59 PM
To: newseditors
Subject: Comments on Fixing Up Grounds Around Beijing Palace Is No Walk in Park, Auguest 26
Dear Editor,
I would like to recommond you two articles reacting to your headline article, Fixing Up Grounds Around Beijing Palace Is No Walk in Park, By Kathy Chen, page A1, 4th column, Auguest 26. The two articles claim that your article contains false and incorrect information, and lacks fairness, objectivity and impartiality. Although the two articles are in Chinese language, I believe some of your staff, at least Ms. Chen, could understand them.
Sincerely,
xxx (Yush)
P.S. The two articles can be found at "New Threads", A US-based Chinese website:
http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/sohu/zhangzhengchun2.txt
http://www.xys.org/xys/ebooks/others/science/dajia6/yuanmingyuan110.txt