at the worst it's a bad choice, no coerce there. critics are alwayswelcome, give people the rights to choice.

of course hiv vaccine would be nice, but it's still far from reality.

this laterst work is like a preemptive strike, i don't think it is much different from angelina jolie' s choice of surgery. both are controversial.

it is true most get hiv later in life, however it is not that easy toa void it. blood transfusion, especially in poor nations. and sex life, condom is no guarantee, i don't think every1 likes to demand a hiv negative from lover before sex.

i think lets keep open mind on those studies, just like china 's work on stem cell therapy for blindness, also controversial.

i do agree on some red tapes:

say no government funds for those studies.

and let layp[ersons be well informed, let them hear both sides vigorously, of course the end result will usaully be confusion, just like what Ms jolie got, is uppose, let her and all such clients decide.