送交者: doublepar 于 2016-09-28, 13:32:15:

• Most are low-level economists from lesser universities - ASH (124 bytes) 2016-09-28, 15:46:36 (817509)
• 川粉的又一例选择性失明：55%经济学家支持希拉里 - 小道消息 (303 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:40:18 (817502)
  • 这没意义。学者都是民主党，党性高于理性。krugman (无内容) - pgss (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 20:35:16 (817538)
    • 经济学家多数是保守派 (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 21:14:13 (817547)
      • 你这是信口开河 (无内容) - pgss (0 bytes) 2016-09-29, 01:56:01 (817568)
        • 这是众所周知的事实，如果是三德斯恐怕会有三千人签名。 - ASH (100 bytes) 2016-09-29, 07:34:45 (817576)
  • 你这是 8 月 22 号的民调吧？上面的声明是前天的。 (无内容) - doublepar (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 15:37:33 (817508)
    • 你认为一个月之内有百分之几的人会改变主意？你吗？ (无内容) - 小道消息 (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 18:37:42 (817521)
  • 58% economists are Dems vs. 23% Reps. So Hillary does not get support - qm (83 bytes) 2016-09-28, 15:15:04 (817507)
    • hehe, Trump support is 15%. What do you say about that? (无内容) - 小道消息 (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 18:39:07 (817522)
  • "Her Republican rival, Donald Trump, didn’t even come in second." (无内容) - 小道消息 (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:45:13 (817505)
• "Hillary Clinton promises to repeat almost all of Obama's policy mistakes" - 小道消息 (84 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:37:32 (817501)
  • As a warning to a sure-winner, this 'overtone' is acceptable. - asker (128 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:52:52 (817506)
• Well. They didn't count DT as a POSSIBLE winner. - asker (399 bytes) 2016-09-28, 13:53:48 (817496)
  • These are pretty strong words, aren't they? - doublepar (173 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:07:51 (817498)
    • Sure. Wouldn't you used the strongest possible words in light of the situation - asker (509 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:42:28 (817504)
  • That's a good spin! (无内容) - doublepar (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:04:46 (817497)
    • Keep cool, man. Isn't the understatement clear enough? (无内容) - asker (0 bytes) 2016-09-28, 14:32:38 (817500)

加跟贴