但是，这“大多数”是多少？11例？15例？还是18例？Tuite 在文章中没有给出这一最重要的数据。即使如此，这一个“most”也已足够判断该双盲实验的根本性错误和数据及结论毫无价值
How many was the “most”, 11? 15? or 18?Authors did not report this critical and most important data...
ACH论文：
CIC and the use of BAMs were terminated 2 weeks prior to preoperative evaluations, and most patients were able to refrain from both of these modalities for the entire 3-year follow-up.
...
we found that most of our patients were able to stay off CIC and BAMs for the entirety of the study, without significant hydronephrosis or renal dysfunction, with the exception of 1 patient in the DT+X group who required bladder augmentation
翻译：
清洁间歇导尿和膀胱活性药物，术前评估之前两个星期就停用了，并且，在整个三年随访期间，大多数患者能够不用。
……
我们发现，整个研究期间，大多数患者能够不用清洁间歇导尿和膀胱活性药物、而且未造成肾积水或肾功能不全，除了一名做了解栓+肖氏手术、需做膀胱扩大术的患者。