You also can do something for the children. UNICEF is better,



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-6-03, 14:56:48:

回答: You are my hero. Honestly! 由 boxer 于 2005-6-03, 14:34:43:

After I know the corruption of project hope.

And China is indeed able to let all children get basic education--again, which is labor-intensive, just the government doesn't want it. It's a shame to let outsider to sponsor the "mandatory education"--if can not afford it, don't call it mandatory. I personally think sponsoring mandatory education is kind of condonation of a government either a) setting an unrealistic goal or b) incompetent, even corrupted to realize a realistic goal or both.

Besides education, UNICEF feed children and provides vaccines, that directly saves lives. It also help out in crises like the South-east Asia Tsunami and the Darfur genocide. They accept even very small amount of regular contribution, the smallest in England is GBP5/month, which is just a jacket for a year, thus even a poor student relieing on financial aid can afford it.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl