唔。上法庭不是陪审团？所以这个大陪审团是bs？

唔。上法庭不是陪审团？所以这个大陪审团是bs？

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: whatistruth 于 2014-11-26, 10:48:58:

回答: Why don't they leave it to trial where there is cross examination? 由 LB 于 2014-11-26, 10:45:33:

case closed, so evidences are opened.

you need Evidence and Motives for murder/kill case.
the jury did not / could not see it.

Not that simple. It is even disagreed among US justice. - LB (957 bytes) 2014-11-26, 10:59:45 (764374)
- Again, everything done here is legal, controversial it may be. Another - chouqilozi (50 bytes) 2014-11-26, 11:06:15 (764378)
  - That justice was nearly saying that it was illegal. (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2014-11-26, 11:13:19 (764381)
    - my understand is that grand jury的责任是看起诉的证据， - LB (30 bytes) 2014-11-26, 11:23:02 (764387)
  - re. they already put the police in the illegal chair in the beginning. - whatistrue (38 bytes) 2014-11-26, 11:12:42 (764380)
- Here is another one. - LB (181 bytes) 2014-11-26, 11:01:25 (764375)