送交者: 通知 于 2013-06-11, 14:58:04:

回答: 葛兰素史克发表声明，确认臧敬五等人在2010年发表的《自然·医学》论文造假 由 方舟子 于 2013-06-11, 12:20:58:

• 大概看懂了这帮鸟人的伎俩。 - LB (402 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:18:41 (719343)
  • “In science, when someone says something, you take it as truth,” - 热干面 (22 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:30:06 (719345)
    • then why the reviewers are needed? (无内容) - cornbug (0 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:34:29 (719347)
      • 这帮人蒙倒reviewer的水平还是有一点的，本来就是赌一把。 (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:39:54 (719349)
        • Something is fishy here. - cornbug (407 bytes) 2013-06-11, 17:05:01 (719356)
          • 病人？老中医的指望就是病人不死。You over estimate them. - LB (236 bytes) 2013-06-11, 17:32:34 (719361)
      • reviewers don't try to repeat experiment. - 热干面 (45 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:38:34 (719348)
• I wonder if charity used in this type of work ? I just donated to MS 150 (无内容) - 热干面 (0 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:17:47 (719342)
• don't understand - cornbug (180 bytes) 2013-06-11, 16:09:35 (719340)
  • yeah, that's exactly what they said in paper "from subj with MS" - 通知 (339 bytes) 2013-06-11, 18:07:14 (719364)
• “all the data is real, but the data comes from healthy individuals” - whatistruth (9 bytes) 2013-06-11, 15:04:19 (719308)
  • 这个辩护太丢人了。 (无内容) - whoami (0 bytes) 2013-06-11, 15:10:36 (719309)
    • 他们以后不用病人了。自己身上搞点样品就行了哈。所以说牛X啊 (无内容) - whatistruth (0 bytes) 2013-06-11, 15:20:58 (719312)

加跟贴