1. We were not thinking about guns or any weapons in hand during those days, as matter of fact we tried our best to get rid of anything that would be considered weapons.
Why? We do not want to give reasons for blood shed, which was not avoided anyway. Deng said (to the effect of): we cannot help if you want blood shed (though they are the ones with leathal weapon)

2. Were Beijingers to have guns how many bullets would be allowed in one magazin? That is so naive to ask!!! Guns was and is or will never be allowed in China, and should not be.

3. He is "lucky and free" to be a proud owner of guns, and not for sport purpose, well, I do not know why he needs it, sounds like he wanted to have it in China but that was impossible (he needed a weapon to defend his right or whatever? facing a massive ruthless government?) now his dream came true (but for what? if the fed is after him nothing could help it, if the Chinese government wants him dead, he would be long dead, if he has to carry weapon to feel safe in the US, this is not where he should stay)

What do you expect me to say? He loves gun and finds reason to own it, has nothing to do with the blood shed in Beijing. He is using it to attract people. Students during 64 were never thinking of violent struggle against the government, was not the plan and was never practical. Should grassroot Chinese have guns in hand the rich and powerful won't be in great danger, the grassroot themselves will be. Only idiots really believes gun for Chinese will help.