I just realized that too. Maybe Fang's example should be



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: Enlighten 于 2006-4-27, 14:52:01:

回答: Enlighten, Mr.Fang's gambling example is still flawed even for 20 times. 由 mangolasi 于 2006-4-27, 14:47:50:

to bet all $20 in different machines simultanously.

Yes. Betting sequentially brings more issues into the experiment. But think of it this way, I think Fang is even more correct in stopping the story right there. Otherwise, it might really take a whole book!



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl