送交者: skipper3 于 2006-4-12, 12:04:41:

回答: According to your logic, Liao didnot need to apologize to wei, to make the 由 ysc 于 2006-4-12, 11:56:33:

But with one condition: no one gets hurt. Now Wei appears to get hurt becasue his reputation is being questioned as a consequence of someone alse not telling the truth.

A note, the reputation of a scientist is his life. You better be careful when questioning Wei's reputation. There are rules you need to observe if you choose to play this kind of game.

• I change the word "questioning" to "destroying". - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2006-4-12, 12:16:22
• According to your logic, no one could criticize others, since it is - ysc (44 bytes) 2006-4-12, 12:16:10
  • You are not criticizing. You are speculating in a very negative way. - skipper3 (104 bytes) 2006-4-12, 12:18:49
    • what is the postive way with respecty to wei's case? - ysc (53 bytes) 2006-4-12, 12:38:19
      • Why can't you just leave doubt with neutral comments? - skipper3 (262 bytes) 2006-4-12, 12:53:28
        • why do i need to keep neutral? - ysc (273 bytes) 2006-4-12, 13:18:12
          • See that's what I mean confusion. - skipper3 (147 bytes) 2006-4-12, 13:36:19
          • chichen blood therapy, not chick serum - ysc (0 bytes) 2006-4-12, 13:28:29

加跟贴