送交者: zhuchebiming 于 2006-4-11, 10:34:34:

the possibility that Si 一篇一篇地伪造数据 too? I have found many problems in Si's papers. Even you verified something they did was wrong. Both Wei and Si should be criticized, as I said days ago, this pair belongs to "dog bites dog". But I don't like Si much, he is too "Daomaoanran" and compared with Wei, his immunology knowledge is theoretically wrong. Wei at least knows the correct developing fronts of immunology.

Considering that Si spent 3 years on his charge against but still failed to know the mistakes in his letter to you, I have to say he is not qualified as one "professor" at all.

• 建议你去一个更合适的地方， - Yush (96 bytes) 2006-4-11, 12:58:18
  • Gee, don't pretend to be neutral. - zhuchebiming (0 bytes) 2006-4-11, 13:48:15
    • r u blind? - Yush (178 bytes) 2006-4-11, 14:17:43
      • that's for the morons like you:)))) - zhuchebiming (178 bytes) 2006-4-11, 14:25:13
        • 应该表扬你一下： - Yush (92 bytes) 2006-4-11, 14:57:08
          • hehe, I met too many morons such as you, this is the reason - zhuchebiming (113 bytes) 2006-4-11, 15:42:38
            • 另外，你的蹩脚英语实在让人忍受不了， - Yush (136 bytes) 2006-4-11, 17:01:02
              • 蹩脚英语? if you want to know what I am talking about, then - zhuchebiming (760 bytes) 2006-4-11, 17:28:02
                • 你的英语实在是高明，行了吧？ - Yush (712 bytes) 2006-4-11, 17:48:54
              • 解决汉字输入问题后， - Yush (62 bytes) 2006-4-11, 17:05:05
            • 刚表扬了你一下，说你胖你就喘？ - Yush (70 bytes) 2006-4-11, 16:57:34
  • 建议他/她还在这儿待着吧，对打魏院士的假有帮助:-) - trus (0 bytes) 2006-4-11, 13:37:39
• 你英语不行，逻辑也混乱。正确的逻辑是： - Yush (79 bytes) 2006-4-11, 12:57:14
  • what are trying to bark? - zhuchebiming (0 bytes) 2006-4-11, 13:49:37

加跟贴